Hypothesis Tested
Does fear-based curiosity ("Stripe's Real Threat") outperform feature-led positioning for B2B audiences?
Decision Enabled
Conflict-driven framing pattern identified as stronger for B2B operator audiences. Pattern now testable.
A $295 pilot that shows which title + thumbnail combinations earn clicks — or you don't pay.
Built for B2B founders using YouTube for pipeline — not entertainment.
After 72 hours, you'll know which packaging angle won. If the pilot doesn't produce a clear decision, you don't pay.
One angle will outperform. You get the winning pattern documented so you can replicate it.
No waiting weeks for data. You know what works within 3 days of upload.
If no clear winner emerges, full refund—no questions, no friction.
Every thumbnail tests a specific psychological trigger—authority, curiosity, social proof—so you know what drives clicks, not what looks nice.
Built for technical founders and operators. No generic patterns—just packaging that converts sophisticated audiences.
After one pilot, you know which angle wins. No ambiguity. No "maybe this will work." Just data you can replicate.
Each pilot tests competing psychological angles to surface what drives clicks. Below: the hypothesis tested and the decision it enabled.
Does fear-based curiosity ("Stripe's Real Threat") outperform feature-led positioning for B2B audiences?
Conflict-driven framing pattern identified as stronger for B2B operator audiences. Pattern now testable.
Does precision (98.1%) + authority outperform vague automation claims for founder audiences?
Precision + visible inflection pattern identified as stronger. Use specific numbers, not generic claims.
Does transparency ($25k visible) or curiosity gap (missing tool) drive higher-intent clicks?
Curiosity gap pattern identified as stronger for high-intent operator traffic. Use "what changed" framing.
Diagnostic tool—used internally to validate packaging decisions. Not sold as a service.
Every packaging test is designed to surface what drives clicks in your niche—so you stop wasting uploads on guesses.
We identify 3-5 psychological angles to test: authority, curiosity gaps, social proof, negative framing, etc. Each variant isolates one variable.
All variants get tested on a single video. We measure CTR, watch time, and audience retention to identify which packaging angle resonates.
After 72 hours, we know which hypothesis won. No ambiguity. You get a clear decision on what to double down on for future uploads.
We document the winning pattern—visual structure, psychological trigger, title format—so you can apply it systematically across your channel.
Most channels waste 8-12 uploads before they figure out what packaging works. Calculate how much revenue you're leaving on the table while you guess—and why a $295 pilot pays for itself in one upload.
$0
A controlled experiment to discover what actually converts your audience—before you waste another upload.
Stop guessing which packaging angle will work. We test 3-5 psychological triggers on one upload and show you exactly which converts.
One-time pilot. No retainer required. Clear decision in 72 hours.
I'm Abhi Muthukrishnan. I don't create designs—I engineer attention capture systems. My background is in data science and behavioral prediction, not graphic design. I apply quantitative rigor to the most critical 200 milliseconds in your marketing funnel: the thumbnail.
Every thumbnail that ships from Genline Studio passes through my personal review. I've spent 3+ years studying attention patterns—what makes sophisticated audiences stop, click, and engage. This isn't freelance work. It's a specialized practice.
I personally validate every thumbnail with AI eye-tracking before delivery. If it doesn't pass the 200ms test, it doesn't ship. You have my direct Slack channel.
$295 pilot proves which packaging angle works for your audience in 72 hours. Clear winner or full refund.